A CEO recently told me his company had “great engagement scores” at 68%. When I asked what that meant for his bottom line, he paused. Turns out, that 68% represented massive untapped potential—and a $2.1 million annual productivity gap he never knew existed.
Most business leaders measure engagement but miss the strategic connection between human motivation and business performance. While 69% of executives rate employee engagement as important, according to Glassdoor research, only 36% of employees actually feel engaged at work. This disconnect costs American businesses up to $550 billion annually in lost productivity, errors, and turnover.
Coming up, we’ll explore why traditional engagement approaches fall short and reveal the decision-making framework that transforms workplace motivation. You’ll discover how to shift from controlling messages to building trust, learn the human-centered approach to data-driven decisions, and get practical tools to create the psychological safety that drives breakthrough performance.
Why Most Engagement Efforts Miss the Mark
The engagement industry has created a measurement obsession that overshadows the fundamental driver of human motivation: feeling genuinely valued as a person, not just a resource.
Most engagement surveys ask employees to rate satisfaction with benefits, management, and workplace conditions. While useful, this approach treats engagement as something done to employees rather than something that emerges from authentic connection and meaningful contribution.
Brian McComak, founder and CEO of Hummingbird Humanity and expert in human-centered leadership, frames the challenge differently. His work with organizations reveals that engagement flourishes when people can bring their full selves to work and contribute in ways that align with their strengths and values.
“So much of the communication principles that I learned growing up in management and leadership were how do you control the message? How do you protect the company? Those messages don’t work for most humans. What they do is they create mistrust and they create a lack of commitment and connection.”
This insight exposes why many well-intentioned engagement initiatives fail. Controlling information while asking for emotional investment creates cognitive dissonance that employees intuitively reject.
The result? Organizations invest in engagement surveys, recognition programs, and wellness initiatives while maintaining communication and decision-making practices that undermine the very connection they seek to build.
The Data Trap That Kills Human Connection
Modern business runs on data, and rightfully so. However, the way most leaders use data inadvertently dehumanizes the very people they want to engage.
McComak observes a critical pattern in executive decision-making:
“I’m an HR person as well, and HR has evolved to be a strategic business partner in so many ways, which I think is great. But that tends to be more business focused and less human focused. So how do we make sure that humans are at the center of every conversation?”
The problem lies in treating people as variables in equations rather than the drivers of those equations. When leaders review quarterly reports, they see revenue per employee, turnover rates, and productivity metrics. What they often miss are the human stories behind those numbers.
Consider this scenario: Your Q3 report shows a 15% decrease in customer satisfaction scores. The data might prompt discussions about training programs or process improvements. But what if the decline stems from your best customer service representative feeling undervalued and mentally checking out? The human element—not the process—drives the metric.
The Human-Behind-the-Numbers Framework
McComak suggests a simple but transformative addition to data analysis:
“Behind every number on every cell of that spreadsheet is a person or a group of humans, and those people are the reason that number exists. When you’re making a decision about it, before we make this decision, I know that’s a number, but how does it impact the humans?”
This approach doesn’t replace analytical rigor. Instead, it adds a human lens that reveals opportunities and risks that pure number analysis misses.
The framework works by asking three questions before finalizing decisions:
- Who are the specific people represented by these metrics? Move beyond demographic categories to understand individual contributors and their circumstances.
- How will this decision affect their ability to perform and grow? Consider both immediate impacts and long-term development implications.
- What modifications would better support their success while achieving business objectives? Look for win-win adjustments that strengthen both human and financial outcomes.
Building Psychological Safety That Drives Performance
The highest-performing teams share one characteristic: psychological safety. Google’s Project Aristotle found this factor more predictive of team success than individual talent, resources, or leadership style.
Yet most leaders struggle to create genuine psychological safety because they confuse it with being “nice” or avoiding difficult conversations. True psychological safety means people can voice concerns, challenge ideas, and admit mistakes without career consequences.
The Feedback Partnership Model
Instead of traditional top-down feedback systems, engaged organizations create partnership-based feedback cultures. McComak describes this approach:
“I need to ask for the people around me, to have a great diverse group of humans around me, I need to ask them to share feedback with me, to tell me if I’m missing something. I need to make space for that and allow them to be safe and allow for people that you lead or manage to say, hey, I know that you’re trying to get this right and I think you’re missing this vantage point.”
This model transforms feedback from performance evaluation to collaborative problem-solving. When employees become partners in improving decisions and processes, engagement shifts from compliance to ownership.
Implementation requires leaders to model vulnerability by:
- Explicitly requesting input on decisions and approaches rather than waiting for unsolicited feedback.
- Demonstrating appreciation for challenging perspectives by acknowledging the value of different viewpoints, even when they create discomfort.
- Following through on feedback by making visible changes based on employee input and explaining when suggestions cannot be implemented.
Transparency as an Engagement Strategy
Traditional corporate communication prioritizes message control and risk management. This approach worked in hierarchical organizations where information flowed one-way. Modern engagement requires a different model.
Transparency builds engagement by treating employees as intelligent partners rather than potential liabilities. When people understand the reasoning behind decisions, they can align their efforts more effectively and contribute meaningful improvements.
The Strategic Transparency Framework
Effective transparency goes beyond sharing good news or sanitized updates. It involves:
- Context sharing: Explain the market conditions, competitive pressures, and strategic considerations that drive major decisions.
- Process visibility: Show how decisions get made, who provides input, and what factors carry the most weight.
- Honest assessment: Acknowledge uncertainties, trade-offs, and areas where leadership needs additional perspective.
- Future planning: Share how current decisions connect to longer-term strategy and individual development opportunities.
This framework helps employees understand their role in the bigger picture while providing information they need to make better daily decisions.
The Discomfort of Authentic Leadership
Many leaders avoid deeper engagement strategies because they require stepping outside comfort zones. Traditional management training emphasized authority, control, and emotional distance. Engagement demands a different leadership style.
McComak offers this reframe for leaders feeling uncertain about more open approaches:
“I love that you’re feeling uncomfortable right now. That means you’re doing something different, and to make workplaces where humans thrive, we have to do things a little different. Lean into the discomfort and embrace the fear.”
This discomfort signals necessary growth. Leaders who remain in their comfort zones maintain the status quo that’s already producing suboptimal engagement levels.
The alternative—continuing approaches that feel safe but generate mediocre results—perpetuates the productivity gaps that cost organizations millions annually.
Building Your Engagement Leadership Skills
Start with small experiments to build confidence:
- Share context behind a routine decision and ask for input on implementation approaches.
- Admit uncertainty about a challenge and invite collaborative problem-solving.
- Ask specific individuals for feedback on your communication style or decision-making process.
- Follow up on previous feedback by explaining what you learned and what you changed.
These practices feel awkward initially but become natural with repetition. The key is consistent application rather than perfect execution.
Practical Tools for Immediate Implementation
The Weekly Engagement Pulse
Replace lengthy annual surveys with brief weekly check-ins that focus on actionable insights:
- What energized you most this week? Identifies activities and interactions that drive motivation.
- What drained your energy? Reveals friction points and process problems.
- What would help you be more effective next week? Generates specific improvement opportunities.
- What question do you wish leadership would ask? Uncovers communication gaps and missed opportunities.
These questions take less than five minutes to answer but provide rich data for targeted improvements.
The Decision Impact Assessment
Before implementing changes that affect multiple people, use this framework:
- Map stakeholder groups: Identify everyone affected by the decision, including indirect impacts.
- Assess individual implications: Consider how the change affects each group’s daily work, development opportunities, and job satisfaction.
- Identify adjustment opportunities: Look for modifications that reduce negative impacts while maintaining business objectives.
- Create communication strategy: Plan how to explain the reasoning, acknowledge concerns, and outline support available during transitions.
This process often reveals simple adjustments that dramatically improve employee experience without compromising business results.
The Strengths Alignment Audit
Engagement increases when people use their natural talents regularly. Conduct quarterly reviews that focus on strengths rather than weaknesses:
- Individual strengths inventory: Help each person identify their top capabilities and preferred work styles.
- Role optimization: Adjust responsibilities to maximize strengths utilization while covering necessary functions.
- Development planning: Create growth opportunities that build on existing strengths rather than trying to fix weaknesses.
- Team composition: Consider strengths diversity when forming project teams and assigning collaborative work.
This approach increases both individual satisfaction and team effectiveness by leveraging natural capabilities.
The Compound Effect of Human-Centered Decisions
Organizations that consistently apply human-centered decision-making experience compound benefits that extend far beyond improved engagement scores. Teams with high engagement levels demonstrate 23% higher profitability, 18% higher productivity, and 12% better customer metrics, according to Gallup research.
These improvements create positive cycles. Better performance leads to increased confidence and motivation, which drives additional performance gains. Meanwhile, engaged employees become advocates who attract higher-quality talent and strengthen organizational reputation.
The investment required—primarily leadership attention and process adjustments rather than significant financial resources—generates returns that multiply over time.
Moving From Measurement to Motivation
Building authentic employee engagement requires shifting focus from measuring satisfaction to creating conditions where people naturally invest their best efforts. The organizations that succeed treat engagement as an ongoing practice of human connection rather than a periodic survey exercise.
Start by examining your current decision-making processes through the human impact lens. Identify opportunities to increase transparency, invite input, and demonstrate genuine care for employee development. Most importantly, embrace the discomfort that comes with more authentic leadership approaches.
The conversation around employee engagement continues evolving as leaders recognize the strategic importance of human motivation. To dive deeper into these concepts and hear more insights from Brian McComak, where he shares additional frameworks for building human-centered leadership that drives business results.
Employee engagement represents one of the most significant untapped opportunities in modern business. When people feel genuinely valued and connected to meaningful work, they contribute far beyond job requirements. If you’re ready to develop engagement strategies that create lasting competitive advantage, schedule a complimentary strategy session to explore how human-centered leadership can transform your organization’s performance.
Not sure if you're the bottleneck? Find out in 2 minutes →
